Controversies in the Management of Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Session Format

Pre-Recorded

Session Type

Clinical Controversy

Topic Area

Description

Risk stratification and treatment options for patients with intermediate-high (submassive) and high (massive) pulmonary embolism has continued to evolve. Recently published guidelines stress the importance of severity assessment and risk-adjusted approaches to management. One area of particular interest in recent years is the utilization of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) to guide the managment of these complex patients. Another evolving area of controversy is the optimal use of mechanical circulatory support in acute PE-associated shock or cardiac arrest. This session will include two pro/con debates surrounding these issues.

Learning Objective 1

List the advantages and potential disadvantages of a PERT.

Learning Objective 2

Describe the impact of PERTs on resources and patient outcomes.

Summary


Availability:	On-Demand


Cost:	FREE


Credit Offered:	1 CME Credit